High-End Frontend Consulting
Architecture decisions that compound
Diagnose structural problems, design systems that scale, make the implicit explicit.
The Problem
Frontend complexity rarely announces itself. It accumulates quietly until everything feels slower than it should.
Features take longer than they should
Accumulated technical debt, unclear component boundaries, or missing abstractions
New developers take months to become productive
Undocumented conventions, tribal knowledge, inconsistent patterns
Design and engineering are constantly misaligned
No shared language, missing design system governance, unclear handoff processes
Performance degrades with every release
No performance budget, bundle size creep, missing monitoring
If any of these sound familiar, the root cause is usually structural. The fix is not more effort, it is better architecture.
What Changes After
- + A documented architecture that your team can explain and evolve
- + Clear component boundaries and ownership
- + Design system foundations (or governance for existing systems)
- + Performance baselines and monitoring
- + Onboarding documentation that actually gets used
What You Get
Concrete deliverables, not vague advice.
Architecture Audit
A thorough review of your current frontend: structure, patterns, dependencies, and pain points. I interview your team, review your codebase, and map the territory.
Recommendations Report
A clear, prioritized document outlining what to fix, what to keep, and what to build. Includes effort estimates and sequencing advice.
Implementation Roadmap
A practical plan your team can execute. Not abstract advice, but specific next steps with decision points.
Knowledge Transfer
Sessions with your team to explain the reasoning behind recommendations. The goal is capability, not dependency.
Who This Is For
Good fit
- + Founders who sense frontend chaos but cannot clearly articulate the problem
- + CTOs inheriting a codebase they did not build
- + Engineering managers preparing for a major scaling phase
- + Teams about to make an expensive architectural decision
Not the right fit
- - Teams looking for an extra pair of hands to ship features
- - Projects that need a complete rebuild (we can discuss alternatives)
- - Organizations not ready to invest in structural change
- - Startups without product-market fit (focus on learning, not architecture)
Investment
Based on codebase size, team size, and depth of engagement
Includes: All deliverables, 2-4 weeks of focused work, follow-up support
Pricing is transparent because filtering matters. If this range does not fit your budget, we are probably not the right match, and that is okay.
"Edgar is a very enthusiastic developer with a proactive attitude and eagerness to learn new technologies. He was able to work within the team to achieve amazing websites..."
Start with a conversation
Tell me about your situation. If this service fits, we will scope an engagement. If not, I will point you in the right direction.
Book a Diagnostic